From: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Protect Kitchen-Table Activism, Stop Grassroots Gag Bill, Call Today! Land Rights Network American Land Rights Association PO Box 400 - Battle Ground, WA 98604 Phone: 360-687-3087 - FAX: 360-687-2973 Email: email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org Web Address: http://www.landrights.org Legislative Office: 507 Seward Square SE - Washington, DC 20003 email@example.com -- 202-489-4893 Protect Kitchen-Table Activism, Stop Grassroots Gag Bill, Call Today! Groundswell Opposition To Grassroots Censorship Expands – Call Your Senators See Human Events article below: It is critical that you call your Senators Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday to oppose the grassroots portion of this bill. It amounts to a gag order on the grassroots. Senators who voted in the Homeland Security Committee for gagging the grassroots are: If you live in their states, you must absolutely bury the phones of the following Senators. Republicans: Susan Collins (R-ME) (202) 224-2523 Ted Stevens (R-AK) (202) 224-3004 George Voinovich (R-OH) (202) 224-3353 Democrats: Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) (202) 224-4041 Carl Levin (D-MI) (202) 224-6221 Daniel Akaka (D-HI) (202) 224-6361 Thomas Carper (D-DE) (202) 224-2441 Mark Dayton (DFL-MN) (202) 224-3244 Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) (202) 224-3224 Mark Pryor (D-AR) (202) 224-2353 If you don’t live in one of these states, make sure you call both your Senators Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. Vote on Censorship on Grassroots Groups and the Internet will likely come Tuesday, but it could be delayed. The new bill number – S 2349. Old bill number was S 2128. You can use both. *****See Action Items Below Protect Kitchen-Table Activism – Stop Grassroots Gag Bill Protect Kitchen-Table Activism by Lanier Swann Concerned Women For America From the Human Events website Posted Mar 06, 2006 -----“Indeed, we ask Congress to consider how grassroots-lobby campaigns contrast to the K Street scandals. Citizen lobbyists are motivated by their beliefs, not a personal power grab. Current proposed grassroots “reform” could threaten the very existence of effective grassroots organizations, liberal and conservative. We urge Capitol Hill to consider the consequences”.----- News cycles and blogospheres are abuzz about private-sector lobbying and how Congress plans to stem corruption in corporate lobbying, also known “inside the Beltway” as “K Street” lobbying. Last Thursday the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs approved legislation aimed at cleaning up some unethical connections between a handful of deep-pocketed lobbyists and bought-off members of Congress. The bill, the Lobbying Transparency and Accountability Act (S. 2128) now contains an amendment that stands to affect not just the private-sector lobbying world, but all concerned activists across the country. Though we fought for a different outcome, the Committee voted 10 to 6 to attach an amendment proposed by Sens. Joseph Lieberman (D.-Conn.) and Carl Levin (D.-Mich.) to regulate grassroots lobbying. Most of the pro-family movement and other nonprofits should not be a part of this equation, but we have been swept up into the reform frenzy. Strangely enough, it reminds of an experience I had long before I ever moved to Washington, D.C. In high school, I studied abroad in Australia. On the trip, nearly every student broke our school’s honor code and sneaked out to enjoy the night life “down under.” Upon return to the States, the Academy I attended immediately expelled all 16 of them. I can still remember how painful it was to testify against them before the honor council. However, as one of the few who had remained in my room past curfew, I was required to tell what I knew. Honesty was a part of the code as well. A year later I again traveled overseas, this time to study in France. All study-abroad participants were forced to endure the consequences from the Australia disaster. Every evening, we were literally taped into our rooms. The next morning, if anyone’s tape was broken, we would be immediately sent home -- no questions asked. As a teen, I struggled with being punished for my friends’ mistakes. How was it fair when I had broken no rules? It was frustrating, hurtful and humiliating. Years later, I find myself in a similar situation. Granted, I’m not being taped into my room, but it seems Congress is doing something cruelly analogous. This time, I’m battling the legacy of corruption left behind by Jack Abramoff. The difference? I never knew Mr. Abramoff. I have never lobbied or even rubbed shoulders with him. In fact, I am not even a K Street lobbyist. I’m a proud member of the pro-family, pro-life grassroots movement. We seek to serve our Lord first and our members second. Period. We have no gimmicks, only our deep and abiding passion in what we believe. We lobby Congress accordingly. While we have never engaged in unethical lobbying, Concerned Women for America (CWA) and other nonprofits are facing increased regulations should the Lobbying Transparency and Accountability Act ever be signed into law. Under this legislation, Congress defines grassroots lobbying as any attempt to influence the public to engage in lobbying contacts in support of a view or position. Moreover, they will define any person or entity who receives compensation for engaging in grassroots lobbying, such as researchers and consulting services who prepare information on issues, to register and disclose all related income. The proposed restrictions would impose corporate-style restraints on grassroots organizations. In other words, no more “kitchen-table activism,” home-grown activism that has developed into many of our country’s strongest organizations, including CWA. These overly broad provisions will impose millions of regulatory costs and adversely harm individuals and groups in their efforts to influence the public to speak out and act about issues of concern. S. 2128 would also require organizations to notify some unknown federal entity within specified days before launching certain grassroots campaigns. Many times we are notified mere days, or even hours, before an issue important to CWA’s members reaches the floor for a vote. If we had to stop, file paperwork, and allow the required time to pass, more than likely we would lose an opportunity to act. The bill would also strip privacy protection from donating members of grassroots organizations. Concerned citizens contribute because they have a personal stake in that organization’s purpose, and protecting their privacy is key. In addition, these onerous requirements violate constitutional rights such as the right to assemble. How could Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream have been realized if these types of restrictions existed decades ago? Dr. King’s grassroots movement was essential to passing laws to ensure the protections of all U.S. citizens, regardless of race. Under many of these proposed reforms, Dr. King would have been a registered grassroots lobbyist, forced to log and disclose any sort of contribution to his efforts. I serve with a team of passionate women and men on the staff of the largest public policy women’s organization in the country. We hold nonprofit status. We lobby not for the betterment of our pocketbook, but for the betterment of our country. Our desire is to see this great nation return to the bedrock moral values of our Founding Fathers. We have no connection to expansive expense accounts, NBA box seats, direct dial numbers to members of Congress, or to Abramoff. Yet we may soon carry the heavy burden of his substantial mistakes. In truth, grassroots groups like CWA are the solution to the lobbying scandal, not the problem. We lobby Congress the way it should be done -- with public involvement in the issues. Indeed, we ask Congress to consider how grassroots-lobby campaigns contrast to the K Street scandals. Citizen lobbyists are motivated by their beliefs, not a personal power grab. Current proposed grassroots “reform” could threaten the very existence of effective grassroots organizations, liberal and conservative. We urge Capitol Hill to consider the consequences. As a student I learned that the consequences of sin have a far-reaching effect. As an adult I see the ripples from a K Street scandal making their way to the kitchen tables of citizen activists. Calm the waters, dear senators, and don’t punish the grassroots for a crime we didn’t commit. Leave the grassroots out of private-sector lobby reform. Miss Swann is director of government Relations for Concerned Women for America, the nation's largest public policy women's organization. Action Items: -----1. Call both your Senators everyday Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday of this coming week regarding S 2349, the new number for the Grassroots Lobby Bill. This is because of sections 107, 110, and other restrictions on citizens who wish to contact their legislators. The bad requirements in S 2349, (formerly S 2128), will penalize grassroots groups and let big money outfits off the hook. Any local organization that wants to educate Congress on their issue could have to file all kinds of forms. The big money outfits will gain a huge advantage that will hurt you. The bill eliminates some restrictions on the Senators themselves. You may call both your Senators at (202) 224-3121. -----2. Ask for your Senators fax number and send him a fax. -----3. Call at least three other people to get them to call and fax. Time is urgent. You must take action immediately. Please forward this message as widely as possible. There must be no grassroots gag order or censorship on the Internet. -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list; please visit http://governance.net and enter your email address.